S. Purtseladze
To Win
C. Ilkel
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W L W W WForm
L W L W L L L W L LThey have played 3 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 2 and Yi winning 1. The last match between Ilkel and Yi was at the Shanghai Challenger, 04-09-2016, Q2 round, Hard with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 6-2 6-7(5) 6-2.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Cem Ilkel | 1 |
Chu-Huan Yi | 0 |
Shanghai Challenger(04-09-2016)
Ilkel | Stats | Yi |
---|---|---|
81% (29-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
574 | Ranking | Ret. |
144 | Highest Rank | 489 |
29 | Age | 37 |
R | Plays | L |
7 | Titles | 2 |
57% (437-333) | Career Total W/L | 53% (155-140) |
$225,530 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
26 Apr 2025 / Semifinals
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Cem Ilkel
Player
Chu-Huan Yi
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
104)
9
Aces
18
1
Double Faults
8
87%
(
40 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
17 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
81
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
18 | Games Won | 11 |
9 | Aces (Total) | 18 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
1:45:36 | Average Match Time | 1:45:36 |
58% (46/79) | 1st Serve % | 63% (65/104) |
87% (40/46) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (45/65) |
67% (22/33) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (19/39) |
36% (4/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/3) |
38% (40/104) | Return Points Win % | 22% (17/79) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Cem Ilkel
Player
Evgenii Tiurnev
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
2
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
23 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Cem Ilkel
Player
Michal Krajci
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
11
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kanan Gasimov
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Cem Ilkel
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
76%
(
62 of
82)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Cem Ilkel
Player
Matteo Lavizzari
58%
(
57 of
98)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
47 of
59)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
34 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Cem Ilkel
Player
David Poljak
61%
(
62 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
110)
9
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
47 of
68)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
30 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
110)
112
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Mert Alkaya
Player
Cem Ilkel
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Cem Ilkel
Player
Henri Haupt
31%
(
4 of
13)
1st Serve %
73%
(
11 of
15)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
1 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
22
Total Points Won
6
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Cem Ilkel
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Cem Ilkel
Player
Tuncay Duran
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
77%
(
67 of
87)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Yunseong Chung
Player
Chu-Huan Yi
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
50%
(
36 of
72)
3
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
13
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
31 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
10 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Kento Takeuchi
Player
Chu-Huan Yi
65%
(
61 of
94)
1st Serve %
62%
(
71 of
114)
10
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
7
80%
(
49 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
50 of
71)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
24 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
42 of
114)
112
Total Points Won
96
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Chu-Huan Yi
Player
Masaki Sasai
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
14
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
4
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
27%
(
24 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
81)
93
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Yan Bai
Player
Chu-Huan Yi
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
45%
(
34 of
76)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
14
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
11 of
42)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Ruan Roelofse
Player
Chu-Huan Yi
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
9
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Cem Ilkel
Player
Chu-Huan Yi
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
104)
9
Aces
18
1
Double Faults
8
87%
(
40 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
17 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
81
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Chu-Huan Yi
Player
Chuhan Wang
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
77%
(
65 of
84)
4
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
2
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
47 of
65)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 7-6(5) 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Ruben Ramirez-Hidalgo
Player
Chu-Huan Yi
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve %
36%
(
16 of
44)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Chu-Huan Yi
Player
Wei Qiang Zheng
58%
(
62 of
107)
1st Serve %
52%
(
47 of
91)
13
Aces
10
8
Double Faults
4
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
37 of
47)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
36 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
91)
101
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Nolan
Player
Chu-Huan Yi
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
61%
(
23 of
38)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
43
Total Points Won
36
|
7-5 ret. | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
57% (437/333) | Win/Loss | 53% (155/140) |
55% (976/805) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (354/322) |
52% (8739/8204) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (3332/3217) |
62% (287/177) | Hard Win/Loss | 52% (120/112) |
45% (57/71) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (18/11) |
55% (92/76) | Indoor Hard W/L | 52% (17/16) |
10% (1/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
2840 | Aces Total | 270 |
0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.07 |
1378 | Total Double Faults | 239 |
1:14:57 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
203.68 | Average Opponent Rank | 495.9 |
58% (23938/40959) | 1st Serve % | 57% (1409/2454) |
70% (16840/23938) | 1st Serve Win % | 76% (1074/1409) |
51% (8684/17021) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (507/1045) |
40% (1616/3994) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (64/153) |
39% (16122/41422) | Return Points Win % | 34% (762/2272) |
32% (7/15) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
67% (2/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
32% (7/15) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/2) |
18% (5/23) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
52% (175/159) | Challenger W/L | 52% (29/27) |
67% (241/120) | Futures W/L | 53% (126/111) |
57% (425/751) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (153/287) |
40% (4/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
54% (146/272) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (54/106) |
56% (130/232) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (46/90) |
85% (423/361) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (157/133) |
14% (423/60) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (157/24) |
21% (346/74) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (137/22) |